Jump to content

Project Staff

Administrators
  • Posts

    1,175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Store

Gallery

Wildflower families of the Discovery Islands

Forest-related journalism

Ocean-related reporting

Primary forest survey: Quadra Island

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (white-coloured wildflowers)

Loss of forest cover on Quadra Island

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (yellow-coloured wildflowers)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (pink-coloured wildflowers)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Blue-flowered wildflowers)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Red-orange-flowered wildflowers)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (brown-coloured wildflowers)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (purple-coloured wildflowers)

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Marine mammals

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Land mammals

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Marine birds

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Forest birds

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Amphibians

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Reptiles

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Marine Invertebrates

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Fish

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Green-flowered wildflowers)

Logging in the watersheds of Quadra Island

Plant species observed on the Discovery Islands that are endangered, threatened or species of concern

Animal species observed on the Discovery Islands that are endangered, threatened or species of concern

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Trees and Shrubs)

Lichen species of the Discovery Islands

Primary forest survey: Read Island

Primary forest survey: Cortes Island

Primary forest survey: Maurelle Island

Primary forest survey: Sonora Island

Primary forest survey: West Redonda Island

Primary forest survey: smaller islands

Primary forest survey: East Redonda Island

Place names: Quadra Island

Place names: Cortes Island

Place names: Read Island

Place names: Maurelle Island

Place names: Sonora Island

Place names: West Redonda Island

Place names: East Redonda Island

Place names: smaller islands

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Grasses, sedges & rushes)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Aquatics)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Ferns)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Lichens)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Fungi)

Plant species of the Discovery Islands (Mosses and Liverworts)

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Butterflies, Skippers and Moths

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Dragonflies and Damselflies

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Bees, Ants and Wasps

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Beetles

Animal species of the Discovery Islands: Slugs and Snails

Loss of forest cover on Read Island

Loss of forest cover on Cortes Island

Loss of forest cover on Maurelle Island

Loss of forest cover on Sonora Island

Loss of forest cover on West Redonda Island

Loss of forest cover on East Redonda Island

Solutions

Photographic survey

Forest carbon release by logging on the Discovery Islands

Portal: Public subsidization of logging on the Discovery Islands

Loss of forest cover on the Discovery Islands

The cost of the public subsidy of clearcut logging on the Discovery Islands

Impact of clearcut logging on forest-related employment

Loss of forest carbon sequestration capacity due to logging

Forest stewardship plans for area-based forest tenures on the Discovery Islands

History of forest loss on the Discovery Islands

Portal: A paradigm shift in how Discovery Islands forests are managed is urgently needed

Portal: Over-exploitation of BC forests

Portal: Imagining a new relationship with forests

Portal: Loss of primary forest

Portal: Destruction of wildlife habitat and loss of biodiversity

Portal: Loss of the hydrological functions of forests

Portal: Increase in forest fire hazard

Portal: Loss of carbon sequestration capacity

Portal: Increase in forest carbon emissions

Portal: Plantation failure

Portal: Use of ecologically damaging practices

Portal: Permanent loss of forest to logging roads, landings and quarries

Portal: Soil loss and damage

Portal: Loss of forest-related employment

Portal: Loss of employment resulting from the export of raw logs

Portal: Costs of floods, fires and clearcutting of community watersheds

Portal: The economic impact on communities of boom and bust cycles

Portal: The instability of communities dependent on forest extraction

Portal: Psychological unease caused by forest destruction

Portal: Loss of trust in institutions as a result of over-exploitation of forests

Portal: Social division caused by over-exploitation of BC forests

Portal: Loss of economic potential of other forest-related sectors

Portal: The economic cost of converting forests into sawdust and wood chips

Portal: The need to reform BC forest legislation

Portal: The need to expedite treaties with First Nations

Portal: The need to get informed, organized and ready for change

Portal: Surveys

Portal: The case for much greater conservation of forests on the Discovery Islands

Portal: Greater conservation of forests is needed to mitigate climate change

Portal: Retention of old and mature forest is necessary to protect biodiversity

Portal: Compared with old and mature forest, logged areas have a higher fire hazard

Portal: The extraordinary beauty of the Discovery Islands needs to be protected

Portal: We support Indigenous title and rights on the Discovery Islands

Portal: Logging on the Discovery Islands is heavily subsidized by the public

Species at risk on the Discovery Islands

Historical record of forest fires on the Discovery Islands

Lakes and wetlands of the Discovery Islands

Recreation Resources: Morte Lake-Chinese Mountain area

Recreation Resources: Nugedzi Lake-Mount Seymour area

Recreation Resources: Newton Lake-Small Inlet-Waiatt Bay area

Recreation Resources: Mud Lake-Nighthawk Lake area

Recreation Resources: Eagle Ridge-Blindman's Bluff area

Recreation Resources: Heriot Ridge area

Recreation Resources: Shellalligan Pass area

Recreation Resources: Two-Mile Lake-Clear Lake-Hummingbird Lake area

Recreation Resources: Maud Island-Saltwater Lagoon

Recreation Resources: Hyacinthe Point area

Recreation Resources: Raven Lake-Raven Ridge area

Recreation Resources: Main Lake Provincial Park

Recreation Resources: Octopus Islands Provincial Park

Recreation Resources: Darkwater Lake-Darkwater Mountain

Salmon bearing streams

Portal map: Salmon bearing streams of the Discovery Islands

Library: Logging and plantations create higher forest fire hazard

Libary: Conservation of forests needed to protect biodiversity

Library: Conservation of forests is needed to mitigate climate change

Library: Supporting Indigenous title and rights

Central library

Portal: Discovery Islands' place names

Export of raw logs from the Discovery Islands

Log exports from the Discovery Islands

Discovery Islands forest tenures and logging plans

Discovery Islands Protected Areas

Place names of the Discovery Islands

Portal: Calculation of direct local employment

Watersheds of Quadra Island

Watersheds of Read Island

Watersheds of Cortes Island

Watersheds of Maurelle Island

Watersheds of Sonora Island

Portal: Watersheds of the Discovery Islands

Engaging the mindustry

Species at risk of local extirpation

Artistic Expression

Volunteer

Discussion

Project calculations

Definitions

Fisheries surveys of Discovery Islands creeks

Portal: Resolution of forest-use conflicts

Vancouver Island Land Use Plan

About the Discovery Islands Conservation Project

Recent satellite imagery of forest cover loss on the Discovery Islands

Forest planning documents

Sources for April 2023 complaint to Forest Practices Board

Woodlot 2031 (Okisollo Resources)

Herbicide use

DI Forest Bulletin

Sources for 2024 submission on TFL 47 Johnstone Strait FSP

Comments on proposed cutblocks and roads

Blogs

Events

Downloads

Everything posted by Project Staff

  1. A letter by 200 of the top US forest and climate scientists In 2020, as multiple legislative proposals attempted to shoehorn measures that would increase logging, or increase funding for logging, into COVID-19 stimulus packages, over 200 top U.S. climate and forest scientists asked Congressional leaders to avoid using the pandemic emergency as a means for stripping away forest protections and promoting logging. In a historic and unprecedented letter sent to Congress, the scientists concluded that, in order to avoid the worst impacts of the climate crisis, moving beyond fossil fuel consumption is not enough, and we must also increase forest protections and shift away from energy-intensive and greenhouse-gas polluting wood consumption. (2020) Over 200 Top U.S. Climate and Forest Scientists Urge Congress: Protect Forests to Mitigate Climate Crisis.pdf
  2. By Suzanne W. Simard et al Temperate forests provide crucial ecosystems services as living sinks for atmospheric carbon (C) and repositories of biodiversity. Applying harvesting at intensities that minimize losses offers one means for mitigating global change. However, little is known of overstory retention levels that best conserve ecosystem services in different regional climates, and likewise as climate changes. To quantify the effect of harvest intensity on C stocks and biodiversity, we compared five harvesting intensities (clearcutting, seedtree retention, 30% patch retention, 60% patch retention, and uncut controls) across a climatic aridity gradient that ranged from humid to semi-arid in the Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forests of British Columbia. We found that increased harvesting intensity reduced total ecosystem, aboveground, and live tree C stocks 1 year post- harvest, and the magnitude of these losses were negatively correlated with climatic aridity. In humid forests, total ecosystem C ranged from 50% loss following clearcut harvest, to 30% loss following large patch retention harvest. In arid forests this range was 60 to 8% loss, respectively. Where lower retention harvests are sought, the small patch retention treatment protected both C stocks and biodiversity in the arid forests, whereas the seedtree method performed as well or better in the humid forests. Below-ground C stocks declined by an average of 29% after harvesting, with almost all of the loss from the forest floor and none from the mineral soil. Of the secondary pools, standing and coarse deadwood declined in all harvesting treatments regardless of cutting intensity or aridity, while C stocks in fine fuels and stumps increased. The understory plant C pool declined across all harvesting intensities in the humid forests, but increased in arid forests. Shannon’s diversity and richness of tree and bryoid species declined with harvesting intensity, where tree species losses were greatest in the humid forests and bryoid losses greatest in arid forests. Shrub and herb species were unaffected. This study showed that the highest retention level was best at reducing losses in C stocks and biodiversity, and clearcutting the poorest, and while partial retention of canopy trees can reduce losses in these ecosystem services, outcomes will vary with climatic aridity. (2020) Harvest Intensity Effects on Carbon Stocks and Biodiversity Are Dependent on Regional Climate in Douglas-Fir Forests of British Columbia.pdf
  3. A report by the US Forest Service Forests are considered a natural solution for mitigating climate change because they absorb and store atmospheric carbon. With Alaska boasting 129 million acres of forest, this state can play a crucial role as a carbon sink for the United States. Until recently, the volume of carbon stored in Alaska’s forests was unknown, as was their future carbon sequestration capacity. In 2007, Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act that directed the Department of the Interior to assess the stock and flow of carbon in all the lands and waters of the United States. In 2012, a team composed of researchers with the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Forest Service, and the University of Alaska assessed how much carbon Alaska’s forests can sequester. The researchers concluded that ecosystems of Alaska could be a substantial carbon sink. Carbon sequestration is estimated at 22.5 to 70.0 teragrams (Tg) of carbon per year over the remainder of this century. In particular, Alaska’s dense coastal temperate forests and soils are estimated to sequester 3.4 to 7.8 Tg of carbon per year. Forest management activities were found to have long-term effects on the maximum amount of carbon a site can sequester. These findings helped inform the carbon assessment sections of Chugach and Tongass National Forests’ land management plans. (2020) Forestry as a Natural Climate Solution- The Positive Outcomes of Negative Carbon Emissions.pdf
  4. By William R. Moomaw et al Climate change and loss of biodiversity are widely recognized as the foremost environmental challenges of our time. Forests annually sequester large quantities of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), and store carbon above and below ground for long periods of time. Intact forests—largely free from human intervention except primarily for trails and hazard removals—are the most carbon-dense and biodiverse terrestrial ecosystems, with additional benefits to society and the economy. Internationally, focus has been on preventing loss of tropical forests, yet U.S. temperate and boreal forests remove sufficient atmospheric CO2 to reduce national annual net emissions by 11%. U.S. forests have the potential for much more rapid atmospheric CO2 removal rates and biological carbon sequestration by intact and/or older forests. The recent 1.5 Degree Warming Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change identifies reforestation and afforestation as important strategies to increase negative emissions, but they face significant challenges: afforestation requires an enormous amount of additional land, and neither strategy can remove sufficient carbon by growing young trees during the critical next decade(s). In contrast, growing existing forests intact to their ecological potential—termed proforestation—is a more effective, immediate, and low-cost approach that could be mobilized across suitable forests of all types. Proforestation serves the greatest public good by maximizing co-benefits such as nature-based biological carbon sequestration and unparalleled ecosystem services such as biodiversity enhancement, water and air quality, flood and erosion control, public health benefits, low impact recreation, and scenic beauty. (2019) Intact Forests in the United States- Proforestation Mitigates Climate Change and Serves the Greatest Good.pdf
  5. By Jim Pojar Pojar dismantles 7 myths employed—mainly by the logging industry to justify current logging practices and rates—about forests and carbon. Pojar outlines recommendations and potential solutions that could reduce carbon emissions associated with logging in BC. (2019) Forestry and Carbon in BC Dr. Jim Pojar.pdf
  6. By Beverly E. Law et al Strategies to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions through forestry activities have been proposed, but ecosystem process-based integration of climate change, enhanced CO2, disturbance from fire, and management actions at regional scales are extremely limited. Here, we examine the relative merits of afforestation, reforestation, management changes, and harvest residue bioenergy use in the Pacific Northwest. This region represents some of the highest carbon density forests in the world, which can store carbon in trees for 800 y or more. Oregon’s net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) was equivalent to 72% of total emissions in 2011–2015. By 2100, simulations show increased net carbon uptake with little change in wildfires. Reforestation, afforestation, lengthened har- vest cycles on private lands, and restricting harvest on public lands increase NECB 56% by 2100, with the latter two actions contributing the most. Resultant co-benefits included water availability and biodiversity, primarily from increased forest area, age, and species diversity. Converting 127,000 ha of irrigated grass crops to native forests could decrease irrigation demand by 233 billion cubic metres per year. Utilizing harvest residues for bioenergy production instead of leaving them in forests to decompose increased emissions in the short- term (50 y), reducing mitigation effectiveness. Increasing forest carbon on public lands reduced emissions compared with storage in wood products because the residence time is more than twice that of wood products. Hence, temperate forests with high carbon densities and lower vulnerability to mortality have substantial potential for reducing forest sector emissions. Our analysis framework provides a template for assessments in other temperate regions. (2018) Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests.pdf
  7. A report from the IVEY Foundation and the Canadian Boreal Initiative Canada is a country of forests. We have the world’s largest intact forest area in our northern boreal and our temperate and mountain forests contain biodiversity, climate control and economic values that are globally significant. Climate change will, and is, having a profound impact on these forest ecosystems. Many impacts, such as increases in average temperature and seasonal shifts, are happening in a more compressed timeframe than originally projected by climate scientists. Insect outbreaks, such as the mountain pine beetle, are occurring at a scale that was unimagined ten years ago and some scientists are beginning to warn that many ecosystems may have a “tipping point” beyond which their resilience will be overcome and completely new ecosystems will replace them. Clearly climate strategies in Canada must include those that address the role of this massive and globally significant forest asset. In parallel to these changes in the natural world, society is rapidly accelerating its discussions concerning how to mitigate against rising carbon emissions and climate change impacts. As a result governments, business and civil society are accelerating discussions concerning how to develop an effective mechanism to reduce carbon emissions. Strategies under development include an abundance of voluntary, and a few regulatory, frameworks. While none are identical, many of them contain carbon trading measures that would enable transfers of money from emitters to entities that could sequester or reduce the net rate of carbon emissions. Most of these systems include forests. In Canada there is a need to grapple with this emerging market and determine how it can be influenced and directed in a manner that supports the carbon storage and sequestration capacity of forests and conserves forest biodiversity, while helping to reduces our total country-wide carbon emissions (not just those of forests). How to do this involves a strategic discussion among leading advocates for policy reform. It is only in this way that we can arrive at a consensus on the key elements of a carbon reduction strategy that includes forests and a plan to secure the outcomes we seek. (2007) Forest Carbon sequestration and avoided emissions.pdf
  8. By Don Heppner, Alex Woods, Jennifer Burleigh, Harry Kope and Lorraine Maclauchlan The current, historically unprecedented outbreaks of mountain pine beetle and Dothistroma needle blight in British Columbia are strong indicators that relationships between pests, hosts and climate are being altered as climate changes. Numerous recent pest epidemics elsewhere in North America provide further strong evidence of the impact of changing climate on forest ecosystems. The interactions between pests, hosts and climate are complex, have co-evolved over centuries, and in many instances, are not well understood. This, together with the uncertainty associated with how regional climates will change, makes it difficult to predict the responses of specific pests to climate change. However, as climate changes, the environmental parameters under which present forests were established will change. When these changes result in increasingly sub-optimal conditions, trees will become physiologically stressed. Stressed trees are generally more attractive, more nutritious, and less resistant to many forest pests. Changes in thermal and moisture environments, combined with changes to host plant conditions, will interact synergistically facilitating the development of insect and pathogen outbreaks. The incidence of forest decline syndromes is also likely to increase as a result of general reductions in forest health. Large scale, pest-caused forest decline and mortality will have long-term ecological, social and economic consequences. Timber supplies, water resources as well as other forest resources will be impacted. We anticipate increasing levels of mortality in the standing inventory in many Timber Supply Areas in the province as a result of forest pest activity. Much of the immature growing stock will also be affected by increasing levels of pest-caused mortality, growth losses and regeneration delays. Although the mountain pine beetle epidemic represents a current extreme, in many Timber Supply Areas it is possible that the combined impacts of multiple pests under the influence of climate change could approach a similar magnitude of impact on the remaining timber resource. Although there is still much uncertainty regarding the severity and extent of climate change, there are strategies, which could be implemented to mitigate the impacts on forest health. We provide concise recommendations that would better track changing forest health conditions, increase our ability to forecast pest related impacts of climate change, increase the effectiveness of forest planning by proactively incorporating forest health issues and improve our abilities to prevent, mitigate and adapt to changing forest pest conditions. The unprecedented and concurrent outbreaks of insects and diseases in BC emphasize the need to expedite an action plan on the following nine recommendations of equal importance: 1. Mandate expanded forest health monitoring for forest health agents at the landscape, watershed and stand level, as a component of ministry responsibility; 2. Build a forest health research section; 3. Implement modelling projects to predict future forest health impacts; 4. Maintain forest health strategies and develop climate change risk assessments for each Timber Supply Area; 5. Review and revise legislation and policy to identify forest health risks and strategies within forest stewardship plans; 6. Institute landscape-level planning for forest health, as well as for other values; 7. Develop and implement hazard- and risk-rating systems for forest insects and diseases; 8. Implement changes to tree species selection and stocking standards to enable facilitated migration; 9. Enable the research and development of products and tactics for the treatment of forest insects and diseases. The management of forest lands has clearly become more challenging as a result of climate change. We believe that our current forest management paradigm, which assumes stable climates and stable forest conditions, could be improved to better cope with highly uncertain future forest conditions. Forest management needs to respond and adapt to accommodate the diverse and innovative practices we will require to manage our forests into the future. (2009) The Implications of Climate Change to Forest Health in British Columbia-A Report to the Chief Forester.pdf
  9. By Mathew G. E. Mitchell et al Effectively conserving ecosystem services in order to maintain human wellbeing is a global need that requires an understanding of where ecosystem services are produced by ecosystems and where people benefit from these services. However, approaches to effectively identify key locations that have the capacity to supply ecosystem services and actually contribute to meeting human demand for those services are lacking at broad spatial scales. We developed new methods that integrate measures of the capacity of ecosystems to provide services with indicators of human demand and ability to access these services. We then identified important areas for three ecosystem services currently central to protected area management in Canada—carbon storage, freshwater, and nature-based recreation—and evaluated how these hotspots align with Canada’s current protected areas and resource development tenures. We find that locations of ecosystem service capacity overlap only weakly (27–36%) with actual service providing areas (incorporating human access and demand). Overlapping hotspots of provision for multiple ecosystem services are also extremely limited across Canada; only 1.2% (∼56 000 km2) of the total ecosystem service hotspot area in Canada consists of overlap between all three ecosystem services. Canada’s current protected area network also targets service capacity to a greater degree than provision. Finally, one-half to two-thirds of current ecosystem service hotspots (54–66%) overlap with current and planned resource extraction activities. Our analysis demonstrates how to identify areas where conservation and ecosystem service management actions should be focused to more effectively target ecosystem services to ensure that critical areas for ecosystem services that directly benefit people are conserved. Further development of these methods at national scales to assess ecosystem service capacity and demand and integrate this with conventional biodiversity and conservation planning information will help ensure that both biodiversity and ecosystem services are effectively safeguarded. (2020) Identifying key ecosystem service providing areas to inform national-scale conservation planning.pdf
  10. By Alan E. Burger et al We recorded the occurrence and relative abundance of potential predators of the threatened marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) in the Carmanah, Walbran, and Klanawa Valleys on southwest Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Data covering multiple years (1994–2000) came from two series of dawn surveys used to monitor murrelet activities (45 stations in total), and two series of point counts (190 stations). Steller's jays (Cyanocitta stelleri) were consistently the most common potential predator. Common ravens (Corvus corax) and red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) were also frequently encountered, but owls, accipiters, and falcons were rare. Northwestern crows (Corvus caurinus) and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) were rare at our inland stations, but other studies showed that they were common at the coast. The survey and point count data showed that the percent occurrence and relative abundance (individuals per survey) of Steller’s jays, common ravens, and all predators combined were higher at stations bordering clearcuts and roads than at stations within interior forest or bordering streams. Highest counts were usually at sites frequently used by people. Predators were more abundant in the fragmented forests of the Klanawa Valley than in the less disturbed Carmanah-Walbran Valleys. In particular, counts of Steller’s jays at road and clearcut edges were significantly higher in Klanawa than in Carmanah-Walbran. A pilot experiment using 40 artificial nest sites on tree boughs in old-growth patches in the Klanawa Valley revealed that eggs disappeared more rapidly near clearcut edges than in the interior forest. We conclude that predation risk at nests of marbled murrelets is likely to be higher near clearcuts and roads than in interior forest, and higher in fragmented landscapes than in relatively undisturbed old-growth forests. (2004) Effects of Habitat Fragmentation and Forest Edges on Predators of Marbled Murrelets and Other Forest Birds on Southwest Vancouver Island.pdf
  11. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in the Hyacinthe Bay area. We welcome your photographs and comments below. Above: Hyacinthe Point, flanked by Open Bay on the right and Hyacinthe Bay on the left Bonsai Bluff overlooks Hyacinthe Bay Hyacinthe Point can only be accessed by water
  12. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in Octopus Islands Marine Provincial Park. We welcome your photographs and comments below.
  13. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in Octopus Islands Marine Provincial Park. We welcome your photographs and comments below.
  14. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in Raven Ridge-Raven Lake area. We welcome your photographs and comments below. Below: Raven Mountain, with Raven Ridge running east The summit of Raven Mountain with Raven Lake in the valley below and Copper Lake on the far right. The view from Raven Mountain: Deepwater Bay in the foreground, and Discovery Passage beyond that Below: Raven Lake. Nearby forest has been mapped by the BC Conservation Data Centre as a red-listed ecological community.
  15. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in the Darkwater Lake area. We welcome your photographs and comments below.
  16. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in Newton Lake-Small Inlet-Waiatt Bay area. We welcome your photographs and comments below. The trail into Newton Lake, the head of Small Inlet and Waiatt Bay The trail passes two small lakes—including Judy's Lake, above, and a wetland before reaching Newton Lake Most of the trails are within Small Inlet Marine Provincial Park View across Newton Lake, looking northeasterly
  17. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in Octopus Islands Marine Provincial Park. We welcome your photographs and comments below.
  18. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in the Shellalligan Pass area. You are welcome to add your photographs and comments below. The Shellalligan Pass trail follows the east coast of Quadra north to Village Bay (below). At White Point (centre foreground) the trails heads west along the coast of Village Bay and then wanders through thick forest (below).
  19. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in the Two Mile Lake-Clear Lake-Hummingbird Lake area. Add your photographs and comments below. This area of Quadra Island has the greatest concentration of large old trees
  20. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in the Mud Lake-Nighthawk Lake area. Add your photographs and comments below. Nighthawk Lake looking west. The lake is habitat for many aquatic species, including beaver (dam on right).
  21. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in the Nugedzi Lake-Mount Seymour area. We welcome your photographs and comments below. Aerial view of Little Nugedzi Lake (foreground) and Nugedzi Lake
  22. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in the Morte Lake-Chinese Mountain area. Add your photographs and comments below. The view looking southwest toward Campbell River from the summit of South Chinese Mountain
  23. Please help the project record points of interest and beauty in the Eagle Ridge-Blindman’s Bluff area. We welcome your photographs and comments below. The view of Discovery Passage from Eagle Ridge
  24. Nugedzi Lake covers 7.1 hectares of the Village Bay Creek watershed (outlined below with magenta dots). There are salmon-bearing streams in this watershed. Click image to enlarge. Nugedzi Lake, looking south Looking to the south end of the lake from the picnic area Nugedzi Lake, looking north to Mount Seymour
  25. Little Nugedzi Lake covers 2.26 hectares of the Village Bay Creek watershed (outlined below with magenta dots). There are salmon-bearing streams in this watershed. Click image to enlarge.
×
×
  • Create New...